Gestalt on Grid
For proximity I made a grid of 4 by 4 and for the 1st box I played with the white space and put letters around the box and the middle left it empty. I kept on doing that and playing with the space in a diagonal line.
For similarity I made a grid and I made the 1st row of the grid look like the letters didn't fit and there was little white space. for the 2nd row of the grid I made it as a normal fill box with normal space. for the 3rd row I made a little bit of more of white space. and for the 4th row I made it look like with more more white space and the letters separated from each other. this made it look like the letters where getting each time more separated from each other.
For closure I made the grid but just with no boxes filled except for the 4 corners. the boxes that weren't fill made a cross shape and there was a lot of white space, which I found very cool.
For continuity I made like a zigzag some boxes are fill in and some were empty which made it look like it have a lot of white space.
For Figure-Ground I made one column fill in with letters but only for column 2 and 3 and row 2 and 3 were filled and column 1 and 4 were filled. and what I found cool was that it made a H by accident.
My favorite design is proximity and similarity.





I like how the grids look. I also like how this person added the outlines so the grid does not look like it goes on forever, if there was no outline it would look like the grid size is never ending. However this person didnt explain the grid very well, they just put the name and wrote a sentecne or 2 which is fine but it would be better if they explained a little more about how they made the grid. i can see that this person put their heart and soul into making all these grids. I like how all the grids are different, all of them have different ideas but it fits in the gsalt category. I dont like how they put the name and explation in the bottom, i couldnt tell which grid is which, if a begenier was reading this they would be confused about which grid is which, other then that its good. Over all all the grids is fine but due to no less explantion and not being orginized i would give this a 6.90/10 overall.
ReplyDeleteThe First 2 figures are easy to understand what they where trying to make they where going for.
ReplyDeleteWith the proximity they made it a grid apart. There refliction is good becuase it helps explain what they where trying to do and what they where ending up with.
I liked your design based on the continuity principle. How you left some space in between the text. It kind of looks like a frame.
ReplyDeleteThe First 2 figures are easy to understand what they where trying to make they where going for.
ReplyDeleteWith the proximity they made it a grid apart. There refliction is good becuase it helps explain what they where trying to do and what they where ending up with. I give he rating a 8/10.
I really like how the gaps are placed for the Continuity Gestalt principle and it's unique that you used white space to show that. The Figure and Ground one was also very interesting that you started off with all text bolder and it fading away as it gets to the bottom. I would've liked for each reflection to be under each piece so I could read it as I viewed the design.
ReplyDeleteMy favorite design of yours is the 4th design or the proximity design because it creates a sense of of the grid that are empty of being close together and are farther apart and how in some of the text box it is different from the other empty box text. My least favorite design is the first design which is closure because there could have been more text boxes to add to show a shape of the design.
ReplyDelete